More good news from Eman over at ccieflyer.com
Inactive, Retired or Celebrated CCIEs
Way back in October of 2008 in the pages of the CCIE Flyer we carried an article by Terry Slattery where he groused/mused about grandfathering CCIEs. Here are a few excerpts from that article.
A couple of years ago at Networkers, I heard about a proposal to grandfather people who had been long-time CCIEs, so that they didn't have to take the recertification test any more. My first thought was that it would significantly weaken the program. How would you know whether someone was an active CCIE or grandfathered without taking time to gather the relevant information and spend the time to verify it? I felt so strongly about it that I spoke out against the idea. Upon further thought, I have a suggestion to resolve the dilemma. When a high ranking military officer retires, he or she gets to retain the title, but with the addition of "Retired" (e.g. General Kilroy, Retired). Why not do the same thing for the CCIE program? It shows that the person can think, work hard, excel, and make a difference in their area of expertise. This is exactly what the military moniker conveys and I see no problem with doing the same for the CCIE program. Someday I'll retire and wouldn't mind a business card that says something like:
Terry Slattery, CCIE #1026/Inactive
How does this suggestion help the CCIE program? It would provide an official way for people who achieved the CCIE status to continue to get some benefit as well as let future employers know that the person has useful attributes and experience. It could broaden the program's reach to people who have moved into the management world from the technical world. Imagine a Cisco account team finding that they are working with a CCIE/Inactive manager and being able to immediately get into a level of technical detail. The existing Cisco CCIE validation tool can tell whether someone is in active or inactive status, allowing employers to easily check someone's status.
I've not considered how far back such a program should reach. Should all former CCIEs be allowed to use an "Inactive" designation (or whatever the designation would be)? Off hand, I can't think of a reason to limit it and what measure one would use to set such limits. My intuition is that allowing all former CCIEs to use the "Inactive" designation would generate a lot of good will in the networking community.
What do you think?
-Terry
Well recently I read on many posts about the CCIE Emeritus concept that the forward thinking and receptive folks at Learning@Cisco had decided to launch. I like it and let me explain why. I know CCIEs let their numbers expire in many cases when they have climbed the rungs of success to find themselves in management. The need for the cert is then an object of pride and accomplishment and less a necessity. Terry himself confided in me before returning to hands on projects that he needed to in order to stay sharp enough to recertify and because he missed getting his hands dirty. We were having lunch and we discussed this idea he had about allowing a long time CCIE to keep a title on their business cards and signatures that said, “Yes I was a CCIE for over ten years and I am proud of it!” Well Learning@Cisco has gone a step further and is going to provide a seal/symbol, like the ones current CCIEs emblazon their business cards and resumes with. The thing I like about it is not the semantics but the price for doing it, no not the $85 per year fee, the mentoring. Yes remaining in the community of next generation CCIEs as a person of influence is a great thing. Read this announcement from the Cisco site;
This deserves a round of applause Leraning@Cisco and I am a happy supporter of the effort. We need more role models and mentors in the CCIE ranks!
Keep up the good work Rick Smith and company!